[Kiro]

I don't necessarily mind these two features and while I feel they could be made a little harder or perhaps more old school if people see a problem with it, I feel that a Networth Cap is necessary.

What I mean by this is that you would have to be over the Networth Cap to be able to be home invaded, so lets say like 100k networth, that is not that hard to get and if you play the game itself which you will have to to be able to compete you will be over that in the first like 3 days.

This is to stop players from getting home invaded and not being able to buy a car or even play the game, and it also stops players from being car jacked non stop to the point they end up with 500 dollars and no car and nothing to do except cruise for one model per 10 credits which should not be something people have to do.

[C-speed]

That's not a bad idea. So once you reach $100k NW, your account becomes open to HI's and stealing even if you drop back below again? And if you haven't reached $100k NW yet, then you yourself can't HI or steal.

[Kiro]

(02-24-2015, 08:59 PM)C-speed Wrote: That's not a bad idea. So once you reach $100k NW, your account becomes open to HI's and stealing even if you drop back below again? And if you haven't reached $100k NW yet, then you yourself can't HI or steal.

Sounds good to me, I mean if you drop under because you get home invaded or car jacked then I can understand having a protection to get back over again so it cannot be abused.

That would be the only reason I can see on why you would regain protection, but I am wondering if 100k should be the networth cap in general, like if I am 125k and somebody knocks 40k off of me I would then become protected until I re-reach 100k to prevent home invasion abuse.

However if they have models they can get back up so it depends on what you think because you know the game code better than I do, so it just depends on if you think that the 100k would be balanced and enough time for people to get enough models to get back up and not get "stuck"