[PirateRyRy 17]

strEetRAcer Wrote:

Quote:SCENARIO ONE: Gary Ridgeway. Anybody familiar with him? He was a serial killer. We called him the Green River Killer. I don't remember all the facts on the whole trial and whatnot, but Gary killed a shitload of girls. But when he was caught several years later, he was convinced he had done a good thing by killing the women. He would drive through Seattle, pick up a prostitute, and he'd have his fun, and kill her, then proceed to burying her into the hillside alongside the Green River. So because he was making the world a "better" place in his eyes, by killing prostitutes, is that alright? Prostitution is illegal, as is drug dealing. So Gary Ridgeway killing 45+ prostitutes, or a drug dealer getting killed by a fellow drug dealer. Which is more acceptable?

SCENARIO TWO: They are saying Virginia Tech is far worse then Columbine. They are both horrific school shootings, and I'm very sorry for what happened. Call me a cold person if you'd like, but I don't feel any pain for anything that happened in either of the shootings. I didn't know anybody, nor do I know anybody in those areas on a personal level, so how would I feel remorse for something like that? The only emotions I have towards the shootings, is that it's shocking, and it is hella shitty, but I'm not sad. Now back to my point. Why is one school shooting worse than the other? Because they were older? Because there was more deaths involved?

SCENARIO THREE: So you have a store clerk. His store is conveniently on the corner of two major intersections, so he gets plenty of business. The store clerk is a "White" male. One day, a "Black" male decides to come in and shoot the clerk, during a robbery. But meanwhile, you have hundreds of Crips and Bloods in a gang war in southern California. Hundreds of gangmembers are killed, and you all know a very large percentage of drug dealers are in gangs, for that set protection. So what is acceptable? The stereotypical "Black" male coming in to rob the "White" male, and something goes wrong, so the "White" male is left dead behind the counter, or this mass gang war?

SCENARIO FOUR: Now make the store clerk a Middle Eastern Immigrant named Arash Popal struggling to make a good living for his family here in the United States. He gets teased, and threatened all day long while working behind the counter. His Wife is too scared to leave the house, while his kids get beat up at school. Now a "White" male comes into this store. He doesn't want money, so this killing becomes solely race related. So now you have a very sad, and STILL scared widow at home, not bringing in any income, and her children still getting made fun of and ebat up at school. Which is more acceptable? The Gang War that left hundreds of gang members/drug dealers dead in the street, or Arash Popal's case that most likely won't even hit the Evening News?

SCENARIO FIVE: Your brother wakes you up one morning. Lets you know that you need to stay home and watch outside for a very shady black car with dark tint. Count how many times they drive by and, be sure to write down the times that they show up. He asks you to do this for him for the first week. You ask him several questions, but he can't tell you a single thing, or you'll freak out and go into shock when he told you that it's a rival dealer coming to kill your whole family because of customer conflict. So you do as your asked, realise that your brother isn't going to give you answers for your mindbobbling questions. So you wake up one morning to find that your brother was dead in the nieghbors yard. All the times you wrote down for him were always the same. The rival dealer was on schedule everyday for those 7 days, so when Monday rolled around, the dealer was still scoping out the nieghborhood, and your house was his main focus of intent on paying attention. Your brother thought he'd be sly and catch them off guard and come from across the street and take care of the dealer himself. But this time, on Monday morning, that rival dealer was ready to charge his way into the house. So not only did he have back up, he had 2 other cars follwing. Didn't think of that now did he? Six bullets to the chest, one to the cheek, shoulder, and two in the left leg. Your brother is now dead, and you'll never see him again. Now Virginia Tech's Mass shooting rolls around. You live in California. Virginia Tech has never been on your mind except for the occasion basketball game or football game you caught on TV. Which becomes more acceptable?

I have a few more scenarios, but as to if I want to bring them up, that's on me and how I feel like you answer these. Because I am pretty certain you're going to still feel the same way, even though you all should absolutely realise a person is a person. Killing is not acceptable in any way, shape, or form.

More ACCEPTABLE Ryan! C'mon now.. let me tell you what I would do.. F*** the acceptable part... Here's punishment for your 'scenarios'...

Scenario 1: Gary Ridgeway gets euthanized, death. Drug dealer murdering another drug dealer, death by gas chamber.

Scenario 2: Same offense happened multiple times... I'd like to say it's much more worse, yes. Death is Death.. but Death of the whole country is worse than just one, am I wrong? Lets ask a Nazi.. you first Ryan.. The real question is how can punishment be any worse for the multiple offenses? I'd suggest torture, but thats inhumane.. Can only die once though, so we'll have to settle.

Scenario 3: Robber gets the gas chamber, death. Cold blooded killer in my eyes, no need to keep him here. Known gang members are wanted by police everyday, some have records and some are just waiting or lucky to not have been caught. If a gang member commits murder in anything but self defense, (which would never be proven) he gets rewarded with death, there's no need to keep him here. Thanks for coming, and good night.

Scenario 4: Umm race? Death chamber cares not. Cold blooded killer gets death. End of story.

Scenario 5: wtf.. umm.. Please refer to scenario 4.


Were these all made up by you? Cause they were pretty silly.. Why not mention real cases: Tookie Williams, Willie Horton... Do your research and get back to me.. I am absolutely for the death penalty, none of this correction bullshit.. You look someone straight in the face and pull the trigger, we definitely don't need you on this planet.

What about Tookie Williams? You guys were the ones who told me that it was okay for a drug dealer to kill another drug dealer. I just don't understand how one can be more acceptable then the rest? And you're right, you probably don't need me on this planet. Your baseball team might, but I sure as hell have gone this far with you not being in my life, so I think we've got that settled.

And who said anything about the death penalty? You must have mis-understood everything I said, cuz I was most certainly not asking for what kind of punishments you would get. And Gary Ridgeway got off. They were gonna give him death, but he is only in for life, because they made a deal.